• Content for Lawyers
• Business Blog Writing
• eBook Ghostwriting
• eNewsletter Services
• Local Business Listing Optimization
• Online Article Marketing
• Outsourcing Solutions for Businesses
• SEO Copywriting Services
• SEO Press Releases
• Social Media Content Syndication
• Social Media Marketing

Library

Strategy for Legal Copy: Increase Search Engine Ranking (Case 119, p 3)

Internet marketing requires experienced copywriters that understand how to develop content that is search engine friendly. At We Do Web Content our project managers understand how to manage an online marketing strategy that includes: website promotion; SEO services; increasing search engine ranking; and search engine placement.

Our pricing is 25%, on average, less than the competition and our copywriting is "2nd to none"

This piece is a sample case result that an attorney may benefit from on their legal website.

Disabilities: s/p L5-S1 laminectomy, degenerative disc disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and borderline intellectual functioning.

Notice of Decision: Fully Favorable
Administrative Law Judge: (Insert Judge's Name)
Office of Disability Adjudication & Review (ODAR): (Insert Name of Hearing Office)

Return to Page 1 of Decision

The undersigned finds that the testimony of the medical expert shows careful analysis of the claimant's impairments and was based on a thorough review of the evidence, including the opinion of Dr. Harold Schwartz, the claimant's treating psychiatrist, and his extensive knowledge of an experience in the field of medicine. Further, his determinations are credible because they are supported by objective clinical findings and treating progress notes in the record. Accordingly, the undersigned accepts Dr. Schosheim's testimony with regard to the claimant's severe impairments, and accords great weight to his opinion that the claimant's severe mental impairments meet the severity criteria of Section 12.04 A, 1, (a), (c), (f), (h), and B (1) and (2). The undersigned also accepts and accords great weight to Dr. Schoscheirn's testimony with regard to the claimant's severe physical impairments, that he does not meet the severity criteria of Section 1.04 A&B, Disorders of the Spine. (SSR 96-6p)

Dr. B. Lee Hudson, Ph.D, assessed that the claimant was able to follow simple instructions, but may have moderate limitations in ability to comprehend, recall, and execute detailed instructions and may have difficulty with tasks which require substantial concentration. She opined the claimant's symptoms were not of sufficient severity to interfere with his ability to perform simple, routine tasks with adequate concentration, persistence, or pace over a normal workday/workweek. (Ex. 10F/3) The undersigned accords little weight to the above State agency psychological consultants' mental assessments because evidence received at the hearing level shows that the claimant is more limited that determined by their assessments. Furthermore, the undersigned finds that the State agency reviewing psychologists did not adequately consider the claimant's subjective complaints. (Social Security Ruling 96-6p)

5. The claimant has been under a disability as defined in the Social Security Act since August 1, 2006, the alleged onset date of disability (20 CFR 404.1520(d) and 416.920(d)).

DECISION

Based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits filed on June 5, 2007, the claimant has been disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act since August 1, 2006.

Based on the application for supplemental security income filed on June 2, 2007, the claimant has been disabled under section 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act since August 1, 2006.

The component of the Social Security Administration responsible for authorizing supplemental security income will advise the claimant regarding the nondisability requirements for these payments, and if eligible, the amount and the months for which payment will be made.

Medical improvement is expected with appropriate treatment. Consequently, a continuing disability review is recommended in 24 months.

A determination to appoint a representative payee to manage payments in the claimant's interest is recommended.

The workers' compensation offset provisions at 20 CFR404.408 maybe applicable.

Return to Sample Content

 

Expect to-the-point answers about: converting your website's visitors into customers; the best way to blend social media into your marketing mix; and creating goals for your website.  

Our book normally sells for $29.95 plus postage but we will send it to you for FREE if you ACT NOW!

Free Report

Landing Page Consultation

Sample Content

FAQs